更好

与喷射雾化器对比,为患者提供多达6倍的药物肺内沉降率,1显著提高患者的用药效果。2

喷射雾化器喷射雾化器1

Aerogen UltraAerogen Ultra1

更快

85%的患者使用单剂量2.5mg 沙丁胺醇即实现了症状控制。3
药物起效更快。2

单剂量沙丁胺醇起效的患者比例
单剂量沙丁胺醇起效的患者比例

持续

与喷射雾化器对比,FEV1%和PEFR%改善持续时间更长。2

  • 缩短在急诊室的住院时间3
  • 减少急诊室住院人数3
  • 提高病床使用率3
持续
References
  • 1. Dugernier J et al. SPECT-CT Comparison of Lung Deposition using a System combining a Vibrating-Mesh Nebulizer with a Valved Holding Chamber and a Conventional Jet Nebulizer: a Randomized Cross-over Study. Pharmaceutical Research. 2017;34:290-300.
  • 2. Chweich H et al. Effect on Airflow of Bronchodilator Therapy Delivered via Vibrating-Mesh versus Jet Nebulizers in Acute Asthmatics in an Emergency Department. Poster at ATS. 2019.
  • 3. Dunne RB and Shortt S. Comparison of bronchodilator administration with vibrating-mesh nebulizer and standard jet nebulizer in the emergency department. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2018;36(4):641-646.